The Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has leaked in dual-SIM form over in Russia and carries the product codeSM-G355H. We got two images that show the device with a physical home button along with a capacitive recent apps and back buttons.
According to the leak the Galaxy Core 2 Dual SIM has a 4.5' WVGA (480 x 800 pixels) display on the front, quad-core 1.2 GHz processor, a lowly 512 MB of RAM, 4 GB of internal storage and a microSD card option.
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
The phone comes as heir to the Galaxy Core, Galaxy Core Plus and Galaxy Core Advance lineup. It measures 129.7 x 67.9 x 9.8 mm - around the same as the 4.3' Galaxy Core and Core Plus - and weighs in at 138 g. The camera is a 5 MP unit at the back and a front-facing 0.3 MP.
As a first timer for changing out the heater core and evaporator it took me 2.5 hours to disassemble everything, and just under 6 hours to finish the job. There were two 'problem' spots that cost me at least 1.5 hours together; the 5/16's screw on the bottom of the HVAC container, drivers side, on the bottom. Notes: 7 11/16' x 7 1/8' x 2 1/8' core. Sell until depleted $ 44. Free In-Store or Curbside Pick Up. What happens is I have a.Net Core 2.0 WebApi app (A) and I want to reuse my.Net framework 4.5.2 library(B). I created nuget packages for B and referenced the nuget package in the A. The libraries are downloaded in the C: Users username.nuget packages folder But when I consume B in the code, it errors me out saying.
The battery is a 2,000 mAh unit and the device comes with Samsung's TouchWiz atop Android 4.4 KitKat. Ni kontakt 6 v6 0 3 mac crack full version. There's no LTE on board but there is HSPA+ so we should expect download speeds above 21 Mbps.
The Galaxy Core 2 Dual-SIM is expected to hit the shelves in Russia on May 20 with a price of RUR9,990 (around €200 and $277). Macpilot 11 0 9 percent.
Reader comments
- sudipta
- XuT
you are right bro it would be half rate
- the boy
- t7$
prove it!
- rocky
- KAa
hehehehe so true...
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Q6600 vs 2450M among all CPUs
Benchmark performance using all cores |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Individual core benchmark performance |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Are you paying a premium for performance? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
CPUBoss Score |
Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 |
Seasonality Core 2 4 55
| ||||
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 3,546.5 | vs | 41.8 | More than 84.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later |
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core |
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | vs | 2.94 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.87 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
| ||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor |
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required |
| Much better performance per watt | 19.45 pt/W | vs | 1.19 pt/W | More than 16.2x better performance per watt |
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 85.31W | 3x lower typical power consumption |
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 62.2 °C | More than 60% higher Maximum operating temperature |
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,403 | vs | 924 | More than 50% better PassMark (Single core) score |
| Newer | Jan, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2007 | Release date over 5 years later |
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost |
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i5 2450M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
Seasonality Core 2 4 5 X 4
GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
summary | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 105W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.19 pt/W | 19.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 28.44W |
GeekBench 3 (Single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core)Data courtesy Primate Labs
summary | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| rPGA 988B | |||
| BGA 1023 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 105W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.19 pt/W | 19.45 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 28.44W |
details | Core2 Quad Q6600 | vs | Core i5 2450M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 9 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 62.2°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.52 GHz | 2.94 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 2.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.52 GHz | 2.94 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,300 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 |
